The different views about happiness by christian believers and non believers

The Rapture is real and is foreshadowed throughout Scripture. In Part 1 of the Rapture Series, we examined the Day of The Lord, the Biblical prophecy event that starts the end times if you have not read it, we strongly recommend it here. The Rapture, the supernatural removal of faithful believers in Jesus Christ from the Earth, occurs just as the Day of The Lord is about to begin.

The different views about happiness by christian believers and non believers

History[ edit ] Ellora cavesa world heritage site, are in the Indian state of Maharashtra. The 35 caves were carved into the vertical face of the Charanandri hills between the 5th and 10th centuries.

The 12 Buddhist caves, 17 Hindu caves and 5 Jain caves, built in proximity, suggest religious co-existence and secular sentiments for diversity prevalent during pre-Islamic period of Indian history. Ashoka about years ago, Harsha about years ago accepted and patronised different religions.

As with Levant, Southeast Europe and Spain, Islamic rulers in India treated Hindus as dhimmis in exchange of annual payment of jizya taxes, in a sharia-based state jurisprudence.

With the arrival of Mughal era, Sharia was imposed with continued zeal, with Akbar - the Mughal Emperor - as the first significant exception.

Akbar's instruction for his mausoleum was that it incorporate elements from different religions including Islam and Hinduism. The colonial administrators did not separate religion from state, but marked the end of unequal hierarchy between Islam and Hinduism, and reintroduced the notion of equality before the law for Hindus, Christians and Muslims.

Inthe Raj eliminated all religious jurists, pandits and scholars because the interpretations of the same verse or religious document varied, the scholars and jurists disagreed with each other, and the process of justice had become inconsistent and suspiciously corrupt.

The matter has been repeatedly agitated in the press as well as on the platform. The Jamiat-ul-Ulema-i-Hind, the greatest Moslem religious body has supported the demand and invited the attention of all concerned to the urgent necessity of introducing a measure to this effect.

One such law enacted during the colonial era was the Indian Muslim Personal Law Shariat Application Act, which instead of separating state and religion for Western secularism, did the reverse.

It also set the precedent that religious law, such as sharia, can overlap and supersede common and civil lawsthat elected legislators may not revise or enact laws that supersede religious laws, that people of one nation need not live under the same laws, and that law enforcement process for different individuals shall depend on their religion.

If there is a conflict between central government enacted law and state government law, then the central government law prevails. The monastery was granted asylum by India and relocated to Mysore after the Chinese invasion of Tibet.

The overlap of religion and state, through Concurrent List structure, has given various religions in India, state support to religious schools and personal laws. This state intervention while resonant with the dictates of each religion, are unequal and conflicting.


For example, a Religious and Charitable Endowment Indian law allows state governments to forcibly take over, own and operate Hindu temples, [28] and collect revenue from offerings and redistribute that revenue to any non-temple purposes including maintenance of religious institutions opposed to the temple; [29] [30] Indian law also allows Islamic religious schools to receive partial financial support from state and central government of India, to offer religious indoctrination, if the school agrees that the student has an option to opt out from religious indoctrination if he or she so asks, and that the school will not discriminate any student based on religion, race or other grounds.

Educational institutions wholly owned and operated by government may not impart religious indoctrination, but religious sects and endowments may open their own school, impart religious indoctrination and have a right to partial state financial assistance.

In terms of religions of India with significant populations, only Islam has religious laws in form of sharia which India allows as Muslim Personal Law. Instead, secularism in India means a state that is neutral to all religious groups.

Reader Interactions

Religious laws in personal domain, particularly for Muslim Indians, supersede parliamentary laws in India; and currently, in some situations such as religious indoctrination schools the state partially finances certain religious schools.

These differences have led a number of scholars [8] [32] [33] to declare that India is not a secular state, as the word secularism is widely understood in the West and elsewhere; rather it is a strategy for political goals in a nation with a complex history, and one that achieves the opposite of its stated intentions.

Comparison with Western secularism[ edit ] In the West, the word secular implies three things: Everyone is equal under law, and subject to the same laws irrespective of his or her religion, in the West.

The different views about happiness by christian believers and non believers

In contrast, in India, the word secular does not imply separation of religion and state. It means equal treatment of all religions.

The Indian structure has created incentives for various religious denominations to start and maintain schools, impart religious education, and receive partial but significant financial support from the Indian government.

Similarly, Indian government financially supports, regulates and administers the historic Hindu temples, Buddhist monasteries, and certain Christian religious institutions; this direct Indian government involvement in various religions is markedly different from Western secularism.

Shah Bano Begum Inthe Shah Bano case brought the secularism debate along with a demand for uniform civil code in India to the forefront.

Indian Muslim Personal Law required her husband to pay no alimony. Shah Bano sued for regular maintenance payments under Section of the Criminal Procedure Code, Along with alimony, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India wrote in his opinion just how unfairly Islamic personal laws treated women and thus how necessary it was for the nation to adopt a Uniform Civil Code.

The Chief Justice further ruled that no authoritative text of Islam forbade the payment of regular maintenance to ex-wives.

Muslim opponents argue that any attempt to introduce Uniform Civil Code, that is equal laws for every human being independent of his or her religion, would reflect majoritarian Hindu sensibilities and ideals.

The Islamic feminists movement in India, for example, claim [39] that the issue with Muslim Personal Law in India is a historic and ongoing misinterpretation of the Quran. The feminists claim that the Quran grants Muslim women rights that in practice are routinely denied to them by male Muslim ulema in India.

In India, as a whole, there are religion-specific civil codes that separately govern adherents of different religions. Article 25 2 b [ edit ] Article 25 2 b of the Indian constitution clubs Sikhs, Buddhists and Jains along with Hindus, a position contested by some of these community leaders.

The marble sides are carved with figures of Hindu deities, as well as Christian Saints and Jesus Christ. Writing in the Wall Street JournalSadanand Dhume criticises Indian "Secularism" as a fraud and a failure, since it isn't really "secularism" as it is understood in the western world as separation of religion and state but more along the lines of religious appeasement.

Christians Are Happier, More Socially Connected Than Atheists, Twitter Study Reveals

He writes that the flawed understanding of secularism among India's left wing intelligentsia has led Indian politicians to pander to religious leaders and preachers including Zakir Naikand has led India to take a soft stand against Islamic terrorismreligious militancy and communal disharmony in general.The World Bank study shows that Orthodox believers in Eastern Europe tend to favor left-leaning political preferences and government involvement in the economy than other Christians.

No Religion?

The different views about happiness by christian believers and non believers

7 Types of Non-Believers. It is possible be a positive atheist about the Christian God, for example, while maintaining a stance of negative atheism or even uncertainty on the.

There is only one difference between Christians and non-Christians: Christ. This is the most important difference, and Jesus wants us to recognize it.

Because without actually starting a discussion, talking about faith and spirituality, and purposefully finding out if a person has a relationship with Christ, you won't be able to tell the difference between a .

Dial-the-Truth Ministries a Christian Resource and Tract Ministry

Dial-the-Truth Ministries ( - Electronic Informational Tracts. Divorces are rampant, children are doing their own thing, believers are turning to psychotropic drugs at the same rate as the lost, and the list, comparable with the world, goes on and on.

Do you see any turn around or hope for real repentance ahead?” Tom: My heart goes out to this person, and I put myself in the same position. We talk about . Introduction: Soteriology is a Greek-derived word, literally meaning "the study of salvation" (Greek soteria, σωτηρία).We have devoted subpart A of part 4 to the study of our Lord Jesus Christ: His life, His unique Person, and His work on the cross in making salvation available for all mankind.

Soteriology, as the word is traditionally employed in evangelical theology, is generally.

No Religion? 7 Types of Non-Believers | Alternet